GSP - The Cinderella of Mechanism Design
Abstract
Nearly fifteen years ago, Google unveiled the generalized second price (GSP) auction. By all theoretical accounts including their own [Varian 14], this was the wrong auction --- the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) auction would have been the proper choice --- yet GSP has succeeded spectacularly. We give a deep justification for GSP's success: advertisers' preferences map to a model we call value maximization, they do not maximize profit as the standard theory would believe. For value maximizers, GSP is the truthful auction [Aggarwal 09]. Moreover, this implies an axiomatization of GSP --- it is an auction whose prices are truthful for value maximizers --- that can be applied much more broadly than the simple model for which GSP was originally designed. In particular, applying it to arbitrary single-parameter domains recovers the folklore definition of GSP. Through the lens of value maximization, GSP metamorphosizes into a powerful auction, sound in its principles and elegant in its simplicity.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- January 2017
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1701.05946
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1701.05946
- Bibcode:
- 2017arXiv170105946W
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory
- E-Print:
- Accepted to WWW 2017. A preliminary version of this work "On the Truthfulness of GSP" was presented at the 2015 Ad Auctions Workshop. Many results from this paper also appear in an old version of the related working paper arXiv:1607.04362