Optimal shrinkage-based portfolio selection in high dimensions
Abstract
In this paper we estimate the mean-variance portfolio in the high-dimensional case using the recent results from the theory of random matrices. We construct a linear shrinkage estimator which is distribution-free and is optimal in the sense of maximizing with probability $1$ the asymptotic out-of-sample expected utility, i.e., mean-variance objective function for different values of risk aversion coefficient which in particular leads to the maximization of the out-of-sample expected utility and to the minimization of the out-of-sample variance. One of the main features of our estimator is the inclusion of the estimation risk related to the sample mean vector into the high-dimensional portfolio optimization. The asymptotic properties of the new estimator are investigated when the number of assets $p$ and the sample size $n$ tend simultaneously to infinity such that $p/n \rightarrow c\in (0,+\infty)$. The results are obtained under weak assumptions imposed on the distribution of the asset returns, namely the existence of the $4+\varepsilon$ moments is only required. Thereafter we perform numerical and empirical studies where the small- and large-sample behavior of the derived estimator is investigated. The suggested estimator shows significant improvements over the existent approaches including the nonlinear shrinkage estimator and the three-fund portfolio rule, especially when the portfolio dimension is larger than the sample size. Moreover, it is robust to deviations from normality.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- November 2016
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1611.01958
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1611.01958
- Bibcode:
- 2016arXiv161101958B
- Keywords:
-
- Quantitative Finance - Statistical Finance;
- Mathematics - Statistics Theory;
- Quantitative Finance - Portfolio Management
- E-Print:
- 45 pages, UPDATE3: revised version of the manuscript accepted by Journal of Business and Economic Statistics. substantially revised: Ledoit-Wolf and Kan-Zhou estimators were added, conditions weakened, proofs revised, discussion on the Moore-Penrose approximation included, mistake in the shrinkage formula for c>