Reply to Elsässer's Comment on "How many principles does it take to change a light bulb ... into a laser?"
Abstract
In his Comment, Elsässer claims that the answer to my titular question is one, not four as I have it. He goes on to give the singular principle that supposedly captures the difference between a light-bulb and a laser: $g^{(2)}(\tau=0)=1$. His claim is unconsidered and wrong, his proposed principle is impossible to apply and, when corrected, redundant (it then becomes one of the four I list already), his arguments are manifestly misdirected. My paper stands as is.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- July 2016
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1608.00176
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1608.00176
- Bibcode:
- 2016arXiv160800176W
- Keywords:
-
- Quantum Physics;
- Physics - Optics
- E-Print:
- 5 pages. Reply to a Comment [arxiv:1607.03647] on my paper published in Physica Scripta