Causal and anti-causal learning in pattern recognition for neuroimaging
Abstract
Pattern recognition in neuroimaging distinguishes between two types of models: encoding- and decoding models. This distinction is based on the insight that brain state features, that are found to be relevant in an experimental paradigm, carry a different meaning in encoding- than in decoding models. In this paper, we argue that this distinction is not sufficient: Relevant features in encoding- and decoding models carry a different meaning depending on whether they represent causal- or anti-causal relations. We provide a theoretical justification for this argument and conclude that causal inference is essential for interpretation in neuroimaging.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- December 2015
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1512.04808
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1512.04808
- Bibcode:
- 2015arXiv151204808W
- Keywords:
-
- Statistics - Machine Learning;
- Computer Science - Machine Learning;
- Quantitative Biology - Neurons and Cognition;
- Statistics - Methodology
- E-Print:
- accepted manuscript