Gains and Losses are Fundamentally Different in Regret Minimization: The Sparse Case
Abstract
We demonstrate that, in the classical non-stochastic regret minimization problem with $d$ decisions, gains and losses to be respectively maximized or minimized are fundamentally different. Indeed, by considering the additional sparsity assumption (at each stage, at most $s$ decisions incur a nonzero outcome), we derive optimal regret bounds of different orders. Specifically, with gains, we obtain an optimal regret guarantee after $T$ stages of order $\sqrt{T\log s}$, so the classical dependency in the dimension is replaced by the sparsity size. With losses, we provide matching upper and lower bounds of order $\sqrt{Ts\log(d)/d}$, which is decreasing in $d$. Eventually, we also study the bandit setting, and obtain an upper bound of order $\sqrt{Ts\log (d/s)}$ when outcomes are losses. This bound is proven to be optimal up to the logarithmic factor $\sqrt{\log(d/s)}$.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- November 2015
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1511.08405
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1511.08405
- Bibcode:
- 2015arXiv151108405K
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Machine Learning;
- Statistics - Machine Learning