Proof equivalence in MLL is PSPACE-complete
Abstract
MLL proof equivalence is the problem of deciding whether two proofs in multiplicative linear logic are related by a series of inference permutations. It is also known as the word problem for star-autonomous categories. Previous work has shown the problem to be equivalent to a rewiring problem on proof nets, which are not canonical for full MLL due to the presence of the two units. Drawing from recent work on reconfiguration problems, in this paper it is shown that MLL proof equivalence is PSPACE-complete, using a reduction from Nondeterministic Constraint Logic. An important consequence of the result is that the existence of a satisfactory notion of proof nets for MLL with units is ruled out (under current complexity assumptions). The PSPACE-hardness result extends to equivalence of normal forms in MELL without units, where the weakening rule for the exponentials induces a similar rewiring problem.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- October 2015
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1510.06178
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1510.06178
- Bibcode:
- 2015arXiv151006178H
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science
- E-Print:
- Journal version of: Willem Heijltjes and Robin Houston. No proof nets for MLL with units: Proof equivalence in MLL is PSPACE-complete. In Proc. Joint Meeting of the 23rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic and the 29th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 2014