Comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non-experts: The case of two SNIP versions
Abstract
A framework is proposed for comparing different types of bibliometric indicators, introducing the notion of an Indicator Comparison Report. It provides a comprehensive overview of the main differences and similarities of indicators. The comparison shows both the strong points and the limitations of each of the indicators at stake, rather than over-promoting one indicator and ignoring the benefits of alternative constructs. It focuses on base notions, assumptions, and application contexts, which makes it more intelligible to non-experts. As an illustration, a comparison report is presented for the original and the modified SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper) indicator of journal citation impact.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- October 2015
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1510.05128
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1510.05128
- Bibcode:
- 2015arXiv151005128M
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Digital Libraries
- E-Print:
- Author copy of an article accepted for publication in Scientometrics, posted on 17 Oct 2015