Capture-recapture abundance estimation using a semi-complete data likelihood approach
Abstract
Capture-recapture data are often collected when abundance estimation is of interest. In the presence of unobserved individual heterogeneity, specified on a continuous scale for the capture probabilities, the likelihood is not generally available in closed form, but expressible only as an analytically intractable integral. Model-fitting algorithms to estimate abundance most notably include a numerical approximation for the likelihood or use of a Bayesian data augmentation technique considering the complete data likelihood. We consider a Bayesian hybrid approach, defining a "semi-complete" data likelihood, composed of the product of a complete data likelihood component for individuals seen at least once within the study and a marginal data likelihood component for the individuals not seen within the study, approximated using numerical integration. This approach combines the advantages of the two different approaches, with the semi-complete likelihood component specified as a single integral (over the dimension of the individual heterogeneity component). In addition, the models can be fitted within BUGS/JAGS (commonly used for the Bayesian complete data likelihood approach) but with significantly improved computational efficiency compared to the commonly used super-population data augmentation approaches (between about 10 and 77 times more efficient in the two examples we consider). The semi-complete likelihood approach is flexible and applicable to a range of models, including spatially explicit capture-recapture models. The model-fitting approach is applied to two different datasets corresponding to the closed population model $M_h$ for snowshoe hare data and a spatially explicit capture-recapture model applied to gibbon data.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- August 2015
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1508.06313
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1508.06313
- Bibcode:
- 2015arXiv150806313K
- Keywords:
-
- Statistics - Methodology;
- Quantitative Biology - Quantitative Methods
- E-Print:
- Annals of Applied Statistics 2016, Vol. 10, No. 1, 264-285