A reasonable thing that just might work
Abstract
In 1964, John Bell proved that quantum mechanics is "unreasonable" (to use Einstein's term): there are nonlocal bipartite quantum correlations. But they are not the most nonlocal bipartite correlations consistent with relativistic causality ("no superluminal signalling"): also maximally nonlocal "superquantum" (or "PR-box") correlations are consistent with relativistic causality. I show that---unlike quantum correlations---these correlations do not have a classical limit consistent with relativistic causality. The generalization of this result to all stronger-than-quantum nonlocal correlations is a derivation of Tsirelson's bound---a theorem of quantum mechanics---from the three axioms of relativistic causality, nonlocality, and the existence of a classical limit. But is it reasonable to derive (a part of) quantum mechanics from the unreasonable axiom of nonlocality?! I consider replacing the nonlocality axiom with an equivalent axiom that even Bell and Einstein might have considered reasonable: an axiom of local retrocausality.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- July 2015
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1507.01588
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1507.01588
- Bibcode:
- 2015arXiv150701588R
- Keywords:
-
- Quantum Physics
- E-Print:
- To appear in Quantum Nonlocality and Reality: 50 Years of Bell's theorem, eds. S. Gao and M. Bell (Cambridge U. Press), 2015, in press