A Bayesian Model of the Litigation Game
Abstract
Over a century ago, Oliver Wendell Holmes invited scholars to look at the law through the lens of probability theory: "The prophecies of what the courts will do in fact, and nothing more pretentious, are what I mean by the law." Yet few legal scholars have taken up this intriguing invitation. As such, in place of previous approaches to the study of law, this paper presents a non-normative, mathematical approach to law and the legal process. Specifically, we present a formal Bayesian model of civil and criminal litigation, or what we refer to as the litigation game; that is, instead of focusing on the rules of civil or criminal procedure or substantive legal doctrine, we ask and attempt to answer a mathematical question: what is the posterior probability that a defendant in a civil or criminal trial will be found liable, given that the defendant has, in fact, committed a wrongful act?
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- June 2015
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1506.07854
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1506.07854
- Bibcode:
- 2015arXiv150607854G
- Keywords:
-
- Quantitative Finance - Economics
- E-Print:
- 24 pages, 1 table