Boundary-bulk relation for topological orders as the functor mapping higher categories to their centers
Abstract
In this paper, we study the relation between topological orders and their gapped boundaries. We propose that the bulk for a given gapped boundary theory is unique. It is actually a consequence of a microscopic definition of a local topological order, which is a (potentially anomalous) topological order defined on an open disk. Using this uniqueness, we show that the notion of "bulk" is equivalent to the notion of center in mathematics. We achieve this by first introducing the notion of a morphism between two local topological orders of the same dimension, then proving that the bulk satisfying the same universal property as that of the center in mathematics. We propose a classification (formulated as a macroscopic definition) of $n+$1D local topological orders by unitary multi-fusion $n$-categories, and explain that the notion of a morphism between two local topological orders is compatible with that of a unitary monoidal $n$-functor in a few low dimensional cases. We also explain in some low dimensional cases that this classification is compatible with the result of "bulk = center". In the end, we explain that above boundary-bulk relation is only the first layer of a hierarchical structure which can be summarized by the functoriality of the bulk (or center). This functoriality also provides the physical meanings of some well-known mathematical results on fusion 1-categories. This work can also be viewed as the first step towards a systematic study of the category of local topological orders, and the boundary-bulk relation actually provides a useful tool for this study.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- February 2015
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1502.01690
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1502.01690
- Bibcode:
- 2015arXiv150201690K
- Keywords:
-
- Condensed Matter - Strongly Correlated Electrons;
- Mathematics - Category Theory;
- Mathematics - Quantum Algebra
- E-Print:
- 48 pages, 28 figures. a major revision, including a reformulation of the categorical classification (or the macroscopic definition) of local topological orders, the correction of a mistake in Section 6.1 and a removal of some mathematical proofs, which can be found in [arXiv:1507.00503]