Blurring Out Cosmic Puzzles
Abstract
The Doomsday argument and anthropic reasoning are two puzzling examples of probabilistic confirmation. In both cases, a lack of knowledge apparently yields surprising conclusions. Since they are formulated within a Bayesian framework, they constitute a challenge to Bayesianism. Several attempts, some successful, have been made to avoid these conclusions, but some versions of these arguments cannot be dissolved within the framework of orthodox Bayesianism. I show that adopting an imprecise framework of probabilistic reasoning allows for a more adequate representation of ignorance in Bayesian reasoning and explains away these puzzles.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- December 2014
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1412.4382
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1412.4382
- Bibcode:
- 2014arXiv1412.4382B
- Keywords:
-
- Physics - Data Analysis;
- Statistics and Probability;
- Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics;
- Physics - History and Philosophy of Physics
- E-Print:
- 15 pages, 1 figure. To appear in Philosophy of Science (PSA 2014)