Berk-Nash Equilibrium: A Framework for Modeling Agents with Misspecified Models
Abstract
We develop an equilibrium framework that relaxes the standard assumption that people have a correctly-specified view of their environment. Each player is characterized by a (possibly misspecified) subjective model, which describes the set of feasible beliefs over payoff-relevant consequences as a function of actions. We introduce the notion of a Berk-Nash equilibrium: Each player follows a strategy that is optimal given her belief, and her belief is restricted to be the best fit among the set of beliefs she considers possible. The notion of best fit is formalized in terms of minimizing the Kullback-Leibler divergence, which is endogenous and depends on the equilibrium strategy profile. Standard solution concepts such as Nash equilibrium and self-confirming equilibrium constitute special cases where players have correctly-specified models. We provide a learning foundation for Berk-Nash equilibrium by extending and combining results from the statistics literature on misspecified learning and the economics literature on learning in games.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- November 2014
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1411.1152
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1411.1152
- Bibcode:
- 2014arXiv1411.1152E
- Keywords:
-
- Economics - General Economics;
- Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory
- E-Print:
- The statement of Theorem 3 in the previous version was corrected. We thank Yuichi Yamamoto for pointing out this correction to us