The Complexity of Fully Proportional Representation for Single-Crossing Electorates
Abstract
We study the complexity of winner determination in single-crossing elections under two classic fully proportional representation rules---Chamberlin--Courant's rule and Monroe's rule. Winner determination for these rules is known to be NP-hard for unrestricted preferences. We show that for single-crossing preferences this problem admits a polynomial-time algorithm for Chamberlin--Courant's rule, but remains NP-hard for Monroe's rule. Our algorithm for Chamberlin--Courant's rule can be modified to work for elections with bounded single-crossing width. To circumvent the hardness result for Monroe's rule, we consider single-crossing elections that satisfy an additional constraint, namely, ones where each candidate is ranked first by at least one voter (such elections are called narcissistic). For single-crossing narcissistic elections, we provide an efficient algorithm for the egalitarian version of Monroe's rule.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- July 2013
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1307.1252
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1307.1252
- Bibcode:
- 2013arXiv1307.1252S
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory;
- Computer Science - Multiagent Systems;
- 68Q17;
- I.2.11;
- F.2.2
- E-Print:
- 23 pages