On Influence, Stable Behavior, and the Most Influential Individuals in Networks: A Game-Theoretic Approach
Abstract
We introduce a new approach to the study of influence in strategic settings where the action of an individual depends on that of others in a network-structured way. We propose \emph{influence games} as a \emph{game-theoretic} model of the behavior of a large but finite networked population. Influence games allow \emph{both} positive and negative \emph{influence factors}, permitting reversals in behavioral choices. We embrace \emph{pure-strategy Nash equilibrium (PSNE)}, an important solution concept in non-cooperative game theory, to formally define the \emph{stable outcomes} of an influence game and to predict potential outcomes without explicitly considering intricate dynamics. We address an important problem in network influence, the identification of the \emph{most influential individuals}, and approach it algorithmically using PSNE computation. \emph{Computationally}, we provide (a) complexity characterizations of various problems on influence games; (b) efficient algorithms for several special cases and heuristics for hard cases; and (c) approximation algorithms, with provable guarantees, for the problem of identifying the most influential individuals. \emph{Experimentally}, we evaluate our approach using both synthetic influence games as well as several real-world settings of general interest, each corresponding to a separate branch of the U.S. Government. \emph{Mathematically,} we connect influence games to important game-theoretic models: \emph{potential and polymatrix games}.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- March 2013
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1303.2147
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1303.2147
- Bibcode:
- 2013arXiv1303.2147I
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory;
- Computer Science - Social and Information Networks;
- Physics - Physics and Society;
- 68T01;
- 68W40;
- 68Q25;
- I.2.0;
- J.4;
- F.2.0
- E-Print:
- Accepted to AI Journal, subject to addressing the reviewers' points (which are addressed in this version). An earlier version of the article appeared in AAAI-11