Comment on ``Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of Bell's inequality violations''
Abstract
Recently, Pawlowski [Phys. Rev. APLRAAN1050-294710.1103/PhysRevA.82.032313 82, 032313 (2010)] claimed to have proven the security of a quantum key distribution by using only the monogamy of Bell's inequality violations. In the proof, however, he tacitly assumed that the eavesdropper's outcome is binary. The assumption cannot be justified because Eve's (eavesdropper's) power can only be limited by natural principle. We provide a counterexample for a step of the proof.
- Publication:
-
Physical Review A
- Pub Date:
- April 2012
- DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.046301
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1204.4235
- Bibcode:
- 2012PhRvA..85d6301H
- Keywords:
-
- 03.67.Dd;
- 03.65.Ud;
- 03.67.Hk;
- Quantum cryptography;
- Entanglement and quantum nonlocality;
- Quantum communication;
- Quantum Physics
- E-Print:
- 1 page, see also reply [PRA 85, 046302 (2012)]