Guildenstern and Rosencrantz in Quantumland -- A Reply to Adrian Kent
Abstract
This paper is an answer to the first part of Adrian Kent's One World versus Many : the Inadequacy of Everettian Accounts of Evolution, Probability, and Scientific Confirmation [arXiv:0905.0624]. We take issue with Kent's arguments against many-world interpretations of quantum mechanics. We argue that his reasons for preferring single-world interpretations are logically flawed and that his proposed singleworld alternative to probability theory suffers from conceptual problems. We use a few thought-experiments which show that the problems he raises for probabilities in multiverses also apply in a single universe.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- November 2011
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1111.2563
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1111.2563
- Bibcode:
- 2011arXiv1111.2563D
- Keywords:
-
- Quantum Physics
- E-Print:
- 10 pages