The Complexity of Manipulative Attacks in Nearly Single-Peaked Electorates
Abstract
Many electoral bribery, control, and manipulation problems (which we will refer to in general as "manipulative actions" problems) are NP-hard in the general case. It has recently been noted that many of these problems fall into polynomial time if the electorate is single-peaked (i.e., is polarized along some axis/issue). However, real-world electorates are not truly single-peaked. There are usually some mavericks, and so real-world electorates tend to merely be nearly single-peaked. This paper studies the complexity of manipulative-action algorithms for elections over nearly single-peaked electorates, for various notions of nearness and various election systems. We provide instances where even one maverick jumps the manipulative-action complexity up to $\np$-hardness, but we also provide many instances where a reasonable number of mavericks can be tolerated without increasing the manipulative-action complexity.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- May 2011
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1105.5032
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1105.5032
- Bibcode:
- 2011arXiv1105.5032F
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory;
- Computer Science - Computational Complexity;
- Computer Science - Multiagent Systems;
- I.2.11;
- F.2.2;
- F.1.3
- E-Print:
- 35 pages, also appears as URCS-TR-2011-968