Individual-based stability in hedonic games depending on the best or worst players
Abstract
We consider coalition formation games in which each player has preferences over the other players and his preferences over coalitions are based on the best player ($\mathcal{B}$-/B-hedonic games) or the worst player ($\mathcal{W}$/W-hedonic games) in the coalition. We show that for $\mathcal{B}$-hedonic games, an individually stable partition is guaranteed to exist and can be computed efficiently. Similarly, there exists a polynomial-time algorithm which returns a Nash stable partition (if one exists) for $\mathcal{B}$-hedonic games with strict preferences. Both $\mathcal{W}$- and W-hedonic games are equivalent if individual rationality is assumed. It is also shown that for B- or $\mathcal{W}$-hedonic games, checking whether a Nash stable partition or an individually stable partition exists is NP-complete even in some cases for strict preferences. We identify a key source of intractability in compact coalition formation games in which preferences over players are extended to preferences over coalitions.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- May 2011
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.1105.1824
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1105.1824
- Bibcode:
- 2011arXiv1105.1824A
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory;
- 91A12;
- 68Q15;
- F.2;
- J.4
- E-Print:
- 16 pages