Reply to ``Comment on `High-energy neutron scattering from hydrogen using a direct geometry spectrometer'''
Abstract
We reply to the comment raised in Mayers [Phys. Rev. BPLRBAQ0556-280510.1103/PhysRevB.84.056301 84, 056301 (2011)]. The comment claims the conclusions by Stock [Phys. Rev. BPLRBAQ0556-280510.1103/PhysRevB.81.024303 81, 024303 (2010)] are not correct owing to the fact that the resolution is not sensitive to detect the changes in the cross section observed using the indirect geometry instrument VESUVIO. We point out several criticisms of this analysis. First, we note that the energy widths measured at large scattering angles on MARI are the same as those measured on VESUVIO (as illustrated in Fig. 6 of Mayers [Phys. Rev. BPLRBAQ0556-280510.1103/PhysRevB.84.056301 84, 056301 (2011)]). We, however, get the same cross section at all other angles and independent of experimental configuration. We also point out that the current data set presented in the Comment is inconsistent with sum rules of neutron scattering. We do not agree with the arguments presented in the Comment and consider that the deficit in the hydrogen cross section measured on VESUVIO is erroneous. Finally, our experiment shows that the impulse approximation is valid over a wide range of energies and momentum transfers.
- Publication:
-
Physical Review B
- Pub Date:
- August 2011
- DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.056302
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1104.3982
- Bibcode:
- 2011PhRvB..84e6302S
- Keywords:
-
- 61.05.fg;
- Neutron scattering;
- Condensed Matter - Materials Science
- E-Print:
- 2 pages