On "Comment on Supersymmetry, PT-symmetry and spectral bifurcation"
Abstract
In "Comment on Supersymmetry, PT-symmetry and spectral bifurcation" [1], Bagchi and Quesne correctly show the presence of a class of states for the complex Scarf-II potential in the unbroken PT-symmetry regime, which were absent in [2]. However, in the spontaneously broken PT-symmetry case, their argument is incorrect since it fails to implement the condition for the potential to be PT-symmetric: CPT[2( A - B) + α] = 0. It needs to be emphasized that in the models considered in [2], PT is spontaneously broken, implying that the potential is PT-symmetric, whereas the ground state is not. Furthermore, our supersymmetry (SUSY)-based 'spectral bifurcation' holds independent of the sl(2) symmetry consideration for a large class of PT-symmetric potentials.
- Publication:
-
Annals of Physics
- Pub Date:
- February 2011
- DOI:
- 10.1016/j.aop.2010.10.012
- arXiv:
- arXiv:1010.1909
- Bibcode:
- 2011AnPhy.326..538A
- Keywords:
-
- Quantum Physics
- E-Print:
- 2 pages