Does a functional integral really need a Lagrangian?
Abstract
Path integral formulation of quantum mechanics (and also other equivalent formulations) depends on a Lagrangian and/or Hamiltonian function that is chosen to describe the underlying classical system. The arbitrariness presented in this choice leads to a phenomenon called Quantization ambiguity. For example both $L_1=\dot{q}^2$ and $L_2=e^\dot{q}$ are suitable Lagrangians on a classical level ($\delta L_1=0=\delta L_2$), but quantum mechanically they are diverse. This paper presents a simple rearrangement of the path integral to a surface functional integral. It is shown that the surface functional integral formulation gives transition probability amplitude which is free of any Lagrangian/Hamiltonian and requires just the underlying classical equations of motion. A simple example examining the functionality of the proposed method is considered.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- December 2008
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.0812.0678
- arXiv:
- arXiv:0812.0678
- Bibcode:
- 2008arXiv0812.0678K
- Keywords:
-
- Quantum Physics;
- High Energy Physics - Theory;
- Mathematical Physics
- E-Print:
- 4 pages, published version, references added, comments are welcome