Addressing Limitations of the Endpoint Slippage Analysis

Some rate of oxidation and reduction side-reactions will inevitably coexist in most rechargeable batteries. While parasitic reduction traps electrons, parasitic oxidation donates electrons to the cell's inventory and may cause temporary capacity gain. Consequently, capacity measurements can provide unreliable information about the total extent of side-reactions occurring in the cell. The most widely used method to determine the rate of both these parasitic processes involves analyzing the slippage of endpoints, which consists in tracking the termination of cell charge and discharge when data is represented along a cumulative capacity axis. Here, we argue that this approach could lead to inaccuracies when applied to certain systems, which includes Si electrodes in Li-ion batteries and hard carbon in Na-ion batteries. This inaccuracy originates from the smooth nature of the voltage profiles of these materials at low and high alkali-ion content, causing the termination of charge and discharge to be dictated by voltage changes at both the positive and negative electrodes. We analyze this issue in quantitative terms and propose equations that can provide true rates of parasitic processes from experimental endpoint slippage data. This work shows that, in battery science, well-established analytical approaches may not be directly transferrable to new electrode systems.