Measuring the X-ray luminosities of DESI groups from eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey - I. X-ray luminosity-halo mass scaling relation
Abstract
We use the eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS) to measure the rest-frame 0.1-2.4 keV band X-ray luminosities of ~600 000 DESI groups using two different algorithms in the overlap region of the two observations. These groups span a large redshift range of 0.0 ≤ zg ≤ 1.0 and group mass range of $10^{10.76}\, h^{-1}\, \mathrm{M}_{\odot } \le M_h \le 10^{15.0}\, h^{-1}\, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$. (1) Using the blind detection pipeline of eFEDS, we find that 10932 X-ray emission peaks can be cross-matched with our groups, ~38 per cent of which have a signal-to-noise ratio $\rm {S}/\rm {N} \ge 3$ in X-ray detection. Comparing to the numbers reported in previous studies, this matched sample size is a factor of ~6 larger. (2) By stacking X-ray maps around groups with similar masses and redshifts, we measure the average X-ray luminosity of groups as a function of halo mass in five redshift bins. We find that in a wide halo mass range, the X-ray luminosity, LX, is roughly linearly proportional to Mh and quite independent to the redshift of the groups. (3) We use a Poisson distribution to model the X-ray luminosities obtained using two different algorithms and obtain the best-fit $L_{\rm X}=10^{28.46\pm 0.03}M_{\rm h}^{1.024\pm 0.002}$ and $L_{\rm X}=10^{26.73 \pm 0.04}M_{\rm h}^{1.140 \pm 0.003}$ scaling relations, respectively. The best-fit slopes are flatter than the results previously obtained but closer to a self-similar prediction.
- Publication:
-
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Pub Date:
- August 2023
- DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/stad1684
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2306.02594
- Bibcode:
- 2023MNRAS.523.4909Z
- Keywords:
-
- galaxies: clusters: general;
- galaxies: groups: general;
- dark matter;
- X-rays: galaxies: clusters;
- Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies
- E-Print:
- 15 pages, 13 figures, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 523, Issue 4, pp.4909-4922