A solar C/O and sub-solar metallicity in a hot Jupiter atmosphere
Abstract
Measurements of the atmospheric carbon (C) and oxygen (O) relative to hydrogen (H) in hot Jupiters (relative to their host stars) provide insight into their formation location and subsequent orbital migration1,2. Hot Jupiters that form beyond the major volatile (H2O/CO/CO2) ice lines and subsequently migrate post disk-dissipation are predicted have atmospheric carbon-to-oxygen ratios (C/O) near 1 and subsolar metallicities2, whereas planets that migrate through the disk before dissipation are predicted to be heavily polluted by infalling O-rich icy planetesimals, resulting in C/O < 0.5 and super-solar metallicities1,2. Previous observations of hot Jupiters have been able to provide bounded constraints on either H2O (refs. 3-5) or CO (refs. 6,7), but not both for the same planet, leaving uncertain4 the true elemental C and O inventory and subsequent C/O and metallicity determinations. Here we report spectroscopic observations of a typical transiting hot Jupiter, WASP-77Ab. From these, we determine the atmospheric gas volume mixing ratio constraints on both H2O and CO (9.5 × 10−5-1.5 × 10−4 and 1.2 × 10−4-2.6 × 10−4, respectively). From these bounded constraints, we are able to derive the atmospheric C/H (0.35−0.10+0.17? × solar) and O/H (0.32−0.08+0.12? × solar) abundances and the corresponding atmospheric carbon-to-oxygen ratio (C/O = 0.59 ± 0.08; the solar value is 0.55). The sub-solar (C+O)/H (0.33−0.09+0.13? × solar) is suggestive of a metal-depleted atmosphere relative to what is expected for Jovian-like planets1 while the near solar value of C/O rules out the disk-free migration/C-rich2 atmosphere scenario.
- Publication:
-
Nature
- Pub Date:
- October 2021
- DOI:
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03912-6
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2110.14821
- Bibcode:
- 2021Natur.598..580L
- Keywords:
-
- Astrophysics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
- E-Print:
- This is the accepted "pre-proof" version. Minor editorial reference/figure/abstract differences from published version. Published version here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03912-6