Development of Long Chain Alkyl Diol δD as a Paleohydrological Proxy

Understanding past hydroclimate is important to better understand and prepare for future climate changes. Past hydrological change is often studied through δD of lipid biomarkers preserved in sediment. Long chain alkyl diols are lipid biomarkers that are widely distributed in lake and marine sediments. These compounds are produced by certain species of diatoms and algae (Eustigmatophytes). Diol δD is expected to record relative precipitation and evaporation, and other lake surface processes. This would be a valuable addition to the repertoire of organic compounds used for hydrologic reconstruction, such as leaf waxes which record precipitation. While long chain alkyl diols present an opportunity to expand the range of compounds available for compound specific isotope analysis, studies of diol δD are scarce. This study aims to compare diol and leaf wax δD records from Lake Tanganyika spanning approximately the past 20 kyrs in order to elucidate the controlling factors on diol δD values and evaluate the effectiveness of such a record as a paleohydrological proxy. If viable, diol δD records could be used to gain a deeper understanding of past climates. δD leaf wax records have been previously measured in Lake Tanganyika cores (Tierney et al., 2008). This study measures δD of long chain alkyl diols from the same cores in order to compare records. Our current measurements show significant deviations of the diol record from the leaf wax record at times when large magnitude changes in the leaf wax record are occurring, such as a less pronounced Younger Dryas and a more gradual decrease in δD values after Heinrich 1 than the sudden shift expressed by the leaf wax record. In addition to generating a diol δD record through time at Lake Tanganyika, we have also measured diol δD in surface sediments from several east African lakes in order to examine the potential for a proxy calibration. A positive correlation between diol and lake water δD has been observed, suggesting that lake water δD is the primary control while other environmental factors may also effect diol δD values.