Comparing horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios with sediment-to-bedrock spectral ratios in a region with a thin layer of unconsolidated sediments

Underlying sediment can amplify ground motions during earthquakes, making site response estimates key components in seismic evaluations for building infrastructure. The horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) method, using either earthquake signals or ambient noise as input, is an appealing method for estimating site response because it uses only a single seismic station rather than requiring two or more seismometers traditionally used to compute a horizontal sediment-to-bedrock spectral ratio (SBSR). A number of studies have had mixed results when comparing the accuracy of the HVSR versus SBSR methods for identifying the frequencies and amplitudes of the primary resonance peaks. Many of these studies have been carried out in areas of complex geology, such as basins with structures that can introduce 3D effects. Here we assess the effectiveness of the HVSR method by a comparison with the SBSR method and models of transfer functions in an area dominated by a flat and thin, unconsolidated sediment layer over bedrock, which should be an ideal setting for using the HVSR method. In this preliminary study, we analyze teleseismic and regional earthquake recordings from a temporary seismometer array deployed throughout Washington, DC, which is underlain by a wedge of 0 to 270 m thick layer of unconsolidated Atlantic Coastal Plain sedimentary strata. At most sites, we find a close match in the amplitudes and frequencies of large resonance peaks in horizontal ground motions at frequencies of 0.7 to 5 Hz in site response estimates using the HVSR and SBSR methods. Amplitudes of the HVSRs tend to be slightly lower than SBSRs at 3 Hz and less, but the amplitudes of the fundamental resonance peaks often match closely. The results suggest that the HVSR method could be a successful approach to consider for computing site response estimates in areas of simple shallow geology consisting of thin sedimentary layers with a strong reflector at the underlying bedrock surface. [This publication represents the views of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.]