Integrated indicators are important metrics of catchment biogeochemical function

There are many ways to characterise catchment biogeochemical behaviour, but most rely on sporadic measurements that capture transient, rather than steady-state behaviour and function. This is because the ongoing collection of water samples and flow data can be labour intensive and thus costly both in terms of money and time. We propose that key aspects of catchment biogeochemical function can only be determined by the collation of impacts of water quality and flow integrated over time. In this paper we will illustrate how spot sample data may be useful, but also how the integration of sample data over time begins to elucidate catchment functions that may not be apparent from sparse timeslices of information. We use a number of high-resolution time series of water quality and flow data to illustrate the utility of this approach for different determinands and suggest key priorities for both sampling and analysis in small to medium-sized catchments. Clearly it is impractical for high-frequency measurements to form the basis of a wide-ranging approach, due to the prevalence of infrequent sampling as a regulatory preference across much of the world. In order to make our results relevant to this wider perspective, we also consider how infrequent sampling regimes may be used to derive our preferred integrated metrics, and the uncertainties that will be propagated due to the lower timescales of sampling. We use data from Brittany (France), North Carolina (US) and Plynlimmon (UK) to consider how our results translate to different catchments.