Full CI Benchmark Potentials for the 6e^ System Li_2 with a CBS Extrapolation from augccpCV5Z and augccpCV6Z Basis Sets Using Fciqmc and Dmrg
Abstract
Being the simplest uncharged homonuclear dimer after H_2 that has a stable ground state, Li_2 is one of the most important benchmark systems for theory and experiment. In 1930, Delbruck used Li_2 to test his theory of homopolar binding, and it was used again and again as a prototype to test what have now become some of the most ubiquitous concepts in molecular physics (LCAO, SCF, MO, just to name a few). Experimentally, Roscoe and Schuster studied alkali dimers back in 1874. At the dawn of quantum mechanics, the emerging types of spectroscopic analyses we now use today, were tested on Li_2 in the labs of Wurm (1928), Harvey (1929), Lewis (1931), and many others, independently. Li_2 was at the centre of the development of PFOODR in the 80s, and PAS in the 90s; and Lithium BoseEinstein condensates were announced only 1 month after the Nobel Prize winning BEC announcement in 1995. Even now in the 2010s, numerous experimental and theoretical studies on Li have tested QED up to the 7th power of the fine structure constant. Li_2 has also been of interest to subatomic physicists, as it was spectroscopic measurements on ^7Li_2 that determined the spin of ^7Li to be 3/2 in 1931; and Li_2 has been proposed in 2014 as a candidate for the first ``halo nucleonic molecule".
The lowest triplet state a(1^3Σ_u^+) is an excellent benchmark system for all newly emerging ab initio techniques because it has only 6e^, its potential is only 334 cm^{1} deep, it avoids harsh complications from spinorbit coupling, and it is the deepest potential for which all predicted vibrational energy levels have been observed with 0.0001 cm^{1} precision. However the current best ab initio potentials do not even yield all vibrational energy spacings correct to within 1 cm^{1}. This could be because the calculation was only done on a ccpV5Z basis set, or because the QCISD(T,full) method that the authors used, only considered triple excitations while a full CI calculation should include up to hexuple excitations. CCSDTQPH calculations have never yet been reported for anything larger than a DZ basis set, and deterministic FCI calculations for 6e^ have not exceeded the level of TZ basis sets. With FCIQMC and DMRG we are able to calculate the potential with all levels of excitation included, and the hardware requirements for an augccpCV6Z basis set are modest. Energies for augccpCVQZ have already converged to the full CI limit within 0.3 cm^{1}, and 6Z potentials are underway.
 Publication:

71st International Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy
 Pub Date:
 June 2016
 DOI:
 10.15278/isms.2016.TK07
 Bibcode:
 2016isms.confETK07D
 Keywords:

 Theory and Computation