New Prospecting Standarts and Its Comparison with International Regulations in Sinkhole and Cave Investigations
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the prospecting standarts in sinkhole and cave characterization comparing it with the present standarts given by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and the British Standart (BSI). Cave and sinkholes which are important geological occurences could cause hazard and collapse of the ground where residental areas could be under risk. The depth of sinkholes could reach up to hundreds of meters and their width to tens of meters. Most caves which are under conserve and characterized as a natural protected area, a non-destructive investigation is required which is only undertaken by geophysical applications. Two different type of standarts are given in the literature to investigate this kind of geological occurences. The first is the ASTM (1999) standart which offers to use Gravity/Microgravity, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and Electromagnetic, while the BSI standart (1999) depends on the initial application of GPR, Electromagnetic, Electrical Resistivity and Crosshole Seismic. In Turkey however, there are limited studies in cave/sinkhole detection and no standartization in prospecting is presented. For this purpose, we applied a geophysical study in the Yarımburgaz cave, Istanbul/Turkey. In the scope of this study, Microgravity, Electric Tomography, Tomography of Seismic Refraction and Surface Wave Analysis, GPR and Microtremor methods are applied on four different profiles. It has been shown that the outputs of the methods differ as a result of the climatic conditions, properties of the geological environment and the depth/size/shape of the sinkhole/cave. Besides this, the area of application which is either inside the city center, steep valley or on the sea/streamside show also discrepancy in the order of preference of the geophysical application methods when considering the anomalies on different mediums. The results obtained from GPR are deep in relation with the thickness of the clayey unit, the water content of the medium and the thickness of the cave/sinkhole. Microgravity, GPR and Microtremor measurements were applied successfull and easily in the inner-city, while Electric Tomography, Seismic Refraction and MASW Methods showed reliable results which are obtained rapidly.
- Publication:
-
AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts
- Pub Date:
- December 2016
- Bibcode:
- 2016AGUFMNH11A1707K
- Keywords:
-
- 1211 Non-tectonic deformation;
- GEODESY AND GRAVITYDE: 1803 Anthropogenic effects;
- HYDROLOGYDE: 4325 Megacities and urban environment;
- NATURAL HAZARDSDE: 7212 Earthquake ground motions and engineering seismology;
- SEISMOLOGY