High-angle faults control the geometry and morphology of the Corinth Rift

Slip along low-angle normal faults is mechanically difficult, and the existence of low angle detachment faults presents one of most important paradoxes in structural geology. Only a few examples of young continental rifts where low-angle faults may be a mechanism for accommodating strain have been described in the literature, and an important example is the Gulf of Corinth, central Greece. Here, microseismicity, the geometry of onshore faults and deep seismic reflection images have been used to argue for the presence of <30o dipping faults. However, new and reinterpreted data calls into question whether low-angle faults have been influential in controlling rift geometry. We seek to definitively test whether slip on a mature low-angle normal fault can reproduce the long-term geometry and morphology of the Corinth Rift, which involves i) significant uplift of the southern margin, ii) long-term uplift to subsidence ratios across south coast faults of 1 -2, and iii) a northern margin that does not undergo significant long-term uplift. We use PyLith, an open-source finite-element code for quasi-static viscoelastic simulations of crustal deformation and model the uplift and subsidence fields associated with the following fault geometries: i) planar faults with dips of 45-60° that sole onto a 10° detachment at a depth of 6 to 8 km, ii) 45-60° faults, which change to a dip angle of 25-45° at a depth of 3 km and continue to a brittle-ductile transition at 10 km and iii) planar faults which dip 45-60° to the brittle-ductile transition at a depth of 10 km. We show that models involving low-angle detachments, shallower than 8 km produce very minor coseismic uplift of the southern margin and post-seismic relaxation results in the southern margin experiencing net subsidence over many seismic cycles, incompatible with geological observations. Models involving planar faults produce long-term displacement fields involving uplifted southern margin with uplift to subsidence ratios of c. 1:2 and subsidence of the northern margin, compatible with geological observations. We propose that low-angle detachment faults cannot have controlled the long-term geometry of the Corinth rift, and that the rift should no longer be used as an example of low-angle normal faulting.