Levelling VS. InSAR in Urban Underground Construction Monitoring. Case of la Sagrera Railway Station (barcelona, Spain).

Construction processes require monitoring to ensure safety and to control the new and existing structures. The most accurate and spread monitoring method to measure displacements is levelling, a point-like surveying technique that tipically allows for tens of discrete in-situ sub-millimetric measures per squared kilometer. Another emerging technique for mapping soil deformation is the Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR), which is based on SAR images acquired from orbiting satellites. This remote sensing technique can provide better spatial point density than levelling, more extensive spatial coverage and cheaper acquisitions. This paper analyses, compares and discusses levelling and InSAR measurements when they are used to measure the soil deformation induced by the dewatering associated to underground constructions in urban areas. To do so, an experiment was performed in the future railway station of La Sagrera, Barcelona (Spain), in which levelling and InSAR were used to accurately quantify ground deformation by dewatering. Results showed that soil displacements measured by levelling and InSAR were not always consisting. InSAR measurements were more accurate with respect the soil deformation produced by the dewatering while levelling was really useful to determine the real impact of the construction on the nearby buildings.