Comparison of satellite precipitation products with Q3 over the CONUS

The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) is an international satellite mission that provides a new-generation of global precipitation observations. A wealth of precipitation products have been generated since the launch of the GPM Core Observatory in February of 2014. However, the accuracy of the satellite-based precipitation products is affected by discrete temporal sampling and remote spaceborne retrieval algorithms. The GPM Ground Validation (GV) program is currently underway to independently verify the satellite precipitation products, which can be carried out by comparing satellite products with ground measurements. This study compares four Day-1 GPM surface precipitation products derived from the GPM Microwave Imager (GMI), Ku-band Precipitation Radar (KU), Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) and DPR-GMI CoMBined (CMB) algorithms, as well as the near-real-time Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) Late Run product and precipitation retrievals from Microwave Humidity Sounders (MHS) flown on NOAA and METOPS satellites, with the NOAA Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor suite (MRMS; now called "Q3"). The comparisons are conducted over the conterminous United States (CONUS) at various spatial and temporal scales with respect to different precipitation intensities, and filtered with radar quality index (RQI) thresholds and precipitation types. Various versions of GPM products are evaluated against Q3. The latest Version-04A GPM products are in reasonably good overall agreement with Q3. Based on the mission-to-date (March 2014 - May 2016) data from all GPM overpasses, the biases relative to Q3 for GMI and DPR precipitation estimates at 0.5o resolution are negative, whereas the biases for CMB and KU precipitation estimates are positive. Based on all available data (March 2015 - April 2016 at this writing), the CONUS-averaged near-real-time IMERG Late Run hourly precipitation estimate is about 46% higher than Q3. Preliminary comparison of 1-year (2015) MHS precipitation estimates with Q3 shows the MHS is bout 30% lower than Q3. Detailed comparison results are available at http://wallops-prf.gsfc.nasa.gov/NMQ/.