Climate data induced uncertainty in model based estimations of terrestrial primary productivity

Models used to project global vegetation and carbon cycle differ in their estimates of historical fluxes and pools. These differences arise not only from differences between models but also from differences in the environmental and climatic data that forces the models. Here we investigate the role of uncertainties in historical climate data, encapsulated by a set of six historical climate datasets. We focus on terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP) and analyze the results from a dynamic process-based vegetation model (LPJ-GUESS) forced by six different climate datasets and two empirical datasets of GPP (derived from flux towers and remote sensing). We find that the climate induced uncertainty, defined as the difference among historical simulations in GPP when forcing the model with the different climate datasets, can be as high as 33 Pg C yr-1 globally (19% of mean GPP). The uncertainty is partitioned into the three main climatic drivers, temperature, precipitation, and shortwave radiation. Additionally, we illustrate how the uncertainty due to a given climate driver depends both on the magnitude of the forcing data uncertainty (the data range) and the sensitivity of the modeled GPP to the driver (the ecosystem sensitivity). The analysis is performed globally and stratified into five land cover classes. We find that the dynamic vegetation model overestimates GPP, compared to empirically based GPP data over most areas, except for the tropical region. Both the simulations and empirical estimates agree that the tropical region is a disproportionate source of uncertainty in GPP estimation. This is mainly caused by uncertainties in shortwave radiation forcing, of which climate data range contributes slightly higher uncertainty than ecosystem sensitivity to shortwave radiation. We also find that precipitation dominated the climate induced uncertainty over nearly half of terrestrial vegetated surfaces, which is mainly due to large ecosystem sensitivity to precipitation. Overall, climate data ranges are found to contribute more to the climate induced uncertainty than ecosystem sensitivity. Our study highlights the need to better constrain tropical climate and demonstrate that uncertainty caused by climatic forcing data must be considered when comparing and evaluating model results and empirical datasets.