Moving across scales: Challenges and opportunities in upscaling carbon fluxes

Light use efficiency (LUE) type models are commonly used to upscale terrestrial C fluxes and estimate regional and global C budgets. Model parameters are often estimated for each land cover type (LCT) using flux observations from one or more eddy covariance towers, and then spatially extrapolated by integrating land cover, meteorological, and remotely sensed data. Decisions regarding the type of input data (spatial resolution of land cover data, spatial and temporal length of flux data), representation of landscape structure (land use vs. disturbance regime), and the type of modeling framework (common risk vs. hierarchical) all influence the estimates CO2 fluxes and the associated uncertainties, but are rarely considered together. This work presents a synthesis of past and present efforts for upscaling CO2 fluxes and associated uncertainties in the ChEAS (Chequamegon Ecosystem Atmosphere Study) region in northern Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. This work highlights two key future research needs. First, the characterization of uncertainties due to all of the abovementioned factors reflects only a (hopefully relevant) subset the overall uncertainties. Second, interactions among these factors are likely critical, but are poorly represented by the tower network at landscape scales. Yet, results indicate significant spatial and temporal heterogeneity of uncertainty in CO2 fluxes which can inform carbon management efforts and prioritize data needs.