Low-level 14C methane oxidation rate measurements modified for remote field settings

Aerobic methane oxidation limits atmospheric methane emissions from degraded subsea permafrost and dissociated methane hydrates in high latitude oceans. Methane oxidation rate measurements are a crucial tool for investigating the efficacy of this process, but are logistically challenging when working on small research vessels in remote settings. We modified a low-level 14C-CH4 oxidation rate measurement for use in the Beaufort Sea above hydrate bearing sediments during August 2012. Application of the more common 3H-CH4 rate measurement that uses 106 times more radioactivity was not practical because the R/V Ukpik cannot accommodate a radiation van. The low-level 14C measurement does not require a radiation van, but careful isolation of the 14C-label is essential to avoid contaminating natural abundance 14C measurements. We used 14C-CH4 with a total activity of 1.1 μCi, which is far below the 100 μCi permitting level. In addition, we modified field procedures to simplify and shorten sample processing. The original low-level 14C-CH4 method requires 6 steps in the field: (1) collect water samples in glass serum bottles, (2) inject 14C-CH4 into bottles, (3) incubate for 24 hours, (4) filter to separate the methanotrophic bacterial cells from the aqueous sample, (5) kill the filtrate with sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and (6) purge with nitrogen to remove unused 14C-CH4. Onshore, the 14C-CH4 respired to carbon dioxide or incorporated into cell material by methanotrophic bacteria during incubation is quantified by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). We conducted an experiment to test the possibility of storing samples for purging and filtering back onshore (steps 4 and 6). We subjected a series of water samples to steps 1-3 & 5, and preserved with mercuric chloride (HgCl2) instead of NaOH because HgCl2 is less likely to break down cell material during storage. The 14C-content of the carbon dioxide in samples preserved with HgCl2 and stored for up to 2 weeks was stable, showing that oxidation of 14C-CH4 did not occur during storage. On the other hand, the 14C-content of the cell material decreased during storage, and the total carbon content of the filtered biomass decreased by 20% in the first 3 days. These results show that: [1] step 6 can be performed onshore because HgCl2 is an effective preservative even when unused 14C-CH4 is not removed, and [2] cell material is not stable in HgCl2 preserved samples, so filtering (step 4) must take place in the field. Next, we attempted to simplify the field filtering procedure by incubating samples in plastic syringes, and then filtering through a luer lock filter holder connected to the syringe. However, syringe incubated samples yielded oxidation rates up to 27 times slower than those in glass bottles, and demonstrated that plastic syringes are not suitable for incubating samples. Thus, we devised a technique to filter directly from sample bottles, through a syringe filter holder, and into an evacuated glass serum bottle in one step. Overall, we were able to simplify the field protocol to work on small vessels in remote field settings without compromising data quality.