Sustaining professional development gains after the NSF-CCLI grant ends

At San Francisco State University we aimed to transform our freshman-level courses in geology, oceanography, and meteorology using funding from a NSF-CCLI grant—"Creating an academic community to foster curiosity and discovery in introductory Geoscience classes" (2010-2012). In addition to creating a new laboratory space and new laboratory materials, we focused on the professional development of graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) and other departmental instructors. Previously, GTAs were given little support to gain teaching skills and present interesting labs, and there was little communication among the various instructors of the introductory courses. We aimed to change the tenor of the department by infusing discussions about effective teaching practices into the daily academic lives of faculty and GTAs and by creating institutional structures to ensure that innovations continued beyond the life of the NSF grant. We entitled this function of the department a Teaching and Learning Community (TLC). An essential element of the TLC, and the institutionalization of project activities, was to create a new graduate seminar course—"Our Dynamic Classroom"—that is offered every semester. This course was created to provide a mechanism for instructors to meet each week to discuss aspects of teaching pedagogy and to share classroom experiences. Each week a GTA or faculty member leads the discussion. Typical weekly topics include: what is inquiry-based learning, understanding students' misconceptions, teaching quantitative skills, what is the affective domain, improving students' writing skills. In response to participant feedback, the course now focuses more on the needs of specific instructors teaching specific courses. For example, in Spring 2012, seminar participants identified several issues GTAs were encountering, such as students failing to read instructions for labs before executing them, and some members of small collaborative groups not actively participating. Participants read literature about managing small groups and discussed possible techniques to address the problem. Each GTA picked one technique, practiced applying it in subsequent lab sessions, and reported on the results, which were frequently positive. Other professional development activities of the TLC are: (1) providing lecture instructors with an extra teaching unit to meet each week with GTAs teaching the lab and to coordinate teaching approaches; (2) providing faculty teaching units for teaching "Our Dynamic Classroom"; (3) organizing occasional workshops around specific topics, such as scoring the Critical thinking Assessment Test (CAT) and how to teach about the nature of science; (4) including talks about teaching and learning in the department's speaker series. All of these activities have had a positive impact, particularly for GTAs and part-time instructors, who feel much better supported by the department and more confident in their abilities to be effective instructors. Regular faculty have also noticed changes in the department, such as hearing and participating in frequent hallway discussions about teaching pedagogy. With these changes, we anticipate a continuing higher level of attention to teaching effectiveness that benefits both instructors and our students.