Intercomparison Of Approaches For Modeling Second Order Ionospheric Corrections Using Gnss Measurements

Correcting GNSS tracking data for the effects of second order ionospheric effects have been shown to cause a southward shift in GNSS-based precise point positioning solutions by as much as 10 mm, depending on the solar cycle conditions. The most commonly used approaches for modeling the higher order ionospheric effect include, (a) the use of global ionosphere maps to determine vertical total electron content (VTEC) and convert to slant TEC (STEC) assuming a thin shell ionosphere, and (b) using the dual-frequency measurements themselves to determine STEC. The latter approach benefits from not requiring ionospheric mapping functions between VTEC and STEC. However, this approach will require calibrations with receiver and transmitter Differential Code Biases (DCBs). We present results from comparisons of the two approaches. For the first approach, we also compare the use of VTEC observations from IONEX maps compared to climatological model-derived VTEC as provided by the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI2012). We consider various metrics to evaluate the relative performance of the different approaches, including station repeatability, GNSS-based reference frame recovery, and post-fit measurement residuals. Overall, the GIM-based approaches tend to provide lower noise in second order ionosphere correction and positioning solutions. The use of IONEX and IRI2012 models of VTEC provide similar results, especially in periods of low solar activity periods. The use of the IRI2012 model provides a convenient approach for operational scenarios by eliminating the dependence on routine updates of the GIMs, and also serves as a useful source of VTEC when IONEX maps may not be readily available.