Factors affecting the process of CO2 replacement of CH4 from methane hydrate in sediments - Constrained from experimental results

CO2 replacement of CH4 from methane hydrate has been proposed as a method to produce gas from natural gas hydrate by taking advantage of both the production of natural gas and the sequestration of CO2. To examine the validity of this method DOE/Conoco-Philips is considering having a field test in Alaska. The reaction of CO2 replacing CH4 from methane hydrate has been confirmed to be thermodynamically feasible, but concern is always raised about the reaction kinetics. Some kinetic studies in the system of methane hydrate and liquid or gaseous CO2 have found that the reaction proceeds at a very low rate. Natural gas hydrate occurs in sediments with multi-components and complex structure, so matters will be even more complicated. Up to now, few investigations have been carried out concerning the factors affecting the reaction process of CO2 replacing CH4 from methane hydrate. Experiments were implemented with sands, which were recovered from Mallik 5L-38 well, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territory, Canada, sediment that previously contained hydrate although it had been dried completely before our experiments. The water-saturated sands were tightly charged into a plastic bottle (90 mm deep and 60 mm wide), and then this test specimen was sealed in a pressure cell. After methane hydrate was synthesized in the test specimen for 108 days under a pressure of 11 to 8 MPa and a temperature of 3 degrees Celsius, liquid CO2 was introduced into the pressure cell. The conditions under which CO2 was reacted with methane hydrate were ~5.3 MPa and 5 degrees Celsius. After reacting for 15 days, the test specimen was recovered. The test specimen was cut into ~10 mm thick discs, and sub-samples were further taken from each of the discs. In addition to the determination of hydrate saturation and the gas composition, Raman spectroscopic studies were carried out for the sub-samples obtained. The results revealed: 1) less CO2 replacement in the bottom disc of the test specimen as compared with that in the top disc, implying that diffusion was a factor that controlled the movement of CO2 in the sediments, 2) an inhomogeneous replacement reaction even within the same disc, indicating that the contact area between methane hydrate and CO2 was a factor that determined the degree of replacement of CH4 from methane hydrate 3) the separate appearance of CO2 Raman intensities and CH4 Raman intensities in some portions of the test specimen, suggesting that CO2 was present in the form of CO2 hydrate in addition to being together with CH4 in other parts of the hydrate. Further analysis found that both CO2 diffusion and the contact area for reaction were associated with the pore structure of the sediments, which were heterogeneous both in pore size and in pore shape as observed with high resolution X-ray CT.