What's all the stink about BO-? Using negative molecular ions to measure boron isotopes in samples with trace boron

Boron isotope fractionation depends strongly on the coordination of boron in coexisting phases. When boron is tetrahedrally coordinated in one phase and trigonally coordinated in another, equilibrium fractionation can record parameters such as temperature (over a surprisingly wide T for a stable isotope system) or the pH at which phases precipitated from low temperature solutions. The heavy isotope of B is strongly partitioned into fluid phases relative to minerals containing tetrahedrally-coordinated boron and thus B isotope ratios can provide evidence for separation of hydrous fluids from subducted materials and from silicate melts in volcanoes. However, in many cases, the B concentration of relevant solid phases is very low, leading to large errors in the isotope ratio. For example, common analytical protocols for the microanalysis of B on our secondary ion mass spectrometer (SIMS, Cameca 6f) use an O^- primary beam, and detection of positive secondary ions at moderate mass resolving power. On samples containing a few ppm B, analyses may require up to ~2 hours to give integrated signals corresponding to errors of +/- 7 per mil (2 sigma). Increases in ion intensity would result from simply increasing the primary current (at the expense of beam diameter) or increasing transmission by reducing mass resolving power (at the expense of including ¹⁰BH⁺ ions on the ¹¹B⁺ peak). Large magnetic sector SIMS instruments achieve higher transmission at high resolution, but the challenges of obtaining desired precision (+/- 1 permil) remain when boron is present at <2 ppm levels. Another direction to pursue is to find a B-containing ion that is formed more readily than the elemental positive ion. The logical choice is BO^-, an ion isoelectronic with F^-, and one we would expect to show very high ion yields. However, BO^- can be unpleasant to deal with. Isobaric interferences include the toxic species of CN^-: various combinations of the two carbon and nitrogen isotopes are silent but deadly additions to the mass spectrum requiring mass resolving powers exceeding 12000 (M/ΔM) for complete separation. In our preliminary studies, we have used a Cs⁺ primary beam, detection of negative secondary ions and the normal-incidence electron gun for neutralizing positive charge build-up in the crater. The observation of abundant carbon and nitrogen in clay mineral samples reveal the challenges of conducting these analyses. However, carbon and nitrogen contents in other phases of interest are very low, and contaminants can be controlled using careful sample preparation, ultra-high vacuum conditions, and restricting secondary ion detection to the central part of the analyzed crater. Using these conditions, BO^- reeks with intensities up to 100x the elemental negative ion! Through a lot of sweat equity, we will demonstrate the use and limitations of BO^- in isotope microanalyses of low-B samples. We thank the NSF EAR Instruments and Facilities program for encouraging us to explore new analytical techniques.