Paleoseismic evidence for dynamic surface rupturing in an intraplate setting (Lower Rhine Embayment, central Europe)

One of the most enigmatic problems in intraplate earthquake geology is the spatio-temporal recurrence pattern of large earthquakes. Intraplate regions such as the New Madrid seismic zone or the central European rift system are subject to considerable seismic hazards, because fault activity is highly disparate in space and time and our knowledge about the recurrence of large earthquakes is still rudimentary. The current debate in central Europe ranges from slip dominated by repeated large coseismic events to slip dominated by aseismic creep. Here, field evidence in support of the former is sparse, and hence, some authors concluded that many faults move by slow aseismic creep rather than by ground rupturing earthquakes. We report new results from a paleoseismic study carried out in the Lower Rhine Embayment across a subsidiary normal fault in the area of Germany's largest historical earthquake (1756 AD, ML 6.2±0.2) that clearly revealed field evidence of dynamic surface faulting. At the trench site, the fault is covered by <5 m-thick Holocene fluvial gravel and flood deposits overlaying Devonian shale. We mapped a surface offset of ~1 m and a ~10 m wide zone of localized deformation expressed by abundant fractures with aligned and broken clasts extending vertically throughout the entire gravel. Mapping of 237 fractured clasts and the long-axis orientation of ~10.000 clasts defines a deformation zone coinciding with the surface offset and two offset markers within the gravel layers. We interpret these features as the result of coseismic deformation at the near-surface end of the rupture. We rule out alternative processes which may lead to fracturing of pebbles such as freeze-thaw weathering or sediment loading effects, since both the gravel fabric and fracture planes coincide well with the fault orientation. We preclude slow deformation due to aseismic creep as governing process to cause rupturing of pebbles this close to the surface, as this would require an overburden stress of several hundreds of meters according to modelling results (e. g. Eidelmann, 1992, Geology). With a significantly smaller overburden, as in this study, a high differential acceleration force, such as a shock wave produced by an earthquake rupture or a seismic wave would be needed to overcome the pebble's shear resistance. Preliminary radiocarbon data bracket the youngest event horizon to Latest Holocene age. In conclusion, we identified coseismic deformation at the trench site, because special conditions produced a number of features not usually observed in other fault exposures. The thin sedimentary cover (<5 m) above basement rocks and the high groundwater table, which may reduce the shear strength of the pebbles, may have played an important role in producing this deformation pattern. Our results imply that large surface rupturing earthquakes in low-strain intraplate regions may be more common than previously thought.