Turbulence Statistics in the Coastal Ocean Bottom Boundary Layer

A submersible particle image velocimetry (PIV) system was deployed off the coast of New Jersey, near the LEO-15 site, to characterize the flow and turbulence in the inner part of the continental shelf bottom boundary layer. The measurement domain extended from 5 mm at the bottom up to an elevation of 51 cm in different datasets. The flow comprised of a mean current and wave-induced flow with a period of 10 s. The ratio of wave velocity amplitude to mean current magnitude varied over the tidal cycle and with elevation, with a maximum of 2.35. Their relative orientation also varied. Large databases of time-resolved, high resolution, 2D velocity distributions enabled us to calculate the instantaneous spatial velocity gradients, and from them, the statistically converged vertical dissipation rate profiles. Reynolds Stresses were estimated using the Shaw & Trowbridge technique outside of the wave boundary layer (WBL), and directly, using the instantaneous spatial variations in velocity, near the wall. Results were utilized for calculating the shear production profiles. Hilbert Transforms were utilized for calculating the wave phase of each velocity distribution, and performing conditional sampling of data to determine variations in flow and turbulence parameters during a wave cycle. The mean velocity profiles indicated the presence of a wave boundary layer, followed by a transition region, and a log layer above it. The datasets extending to the wall show that there is no clear log layer within the WBL, but, as expected, profiles vary substantially with location relative to the ripples. Phase dependent variations in mean flow and dissipation rate occurred only in the WBL and transition region, but vanished at higher elevations. The dissipation rate typically peaked during acceleration phases of wave-induced motion, especially near the wall, but it sometimes peaked during wave-crest phases. Below the transition region, the dissipation rate increased rapidly as the wall was approached all the way to the ripple crest, presumably due to the increasing presence of eddies with characteristic size of 1-3 times the ripple height that fell in the dissipation range of the energy spectra. Shear production also peaked at the ripple crest, consistent with laboratory data for rough wall boundary layers. Acknowledgements : NSF