3D Inversion of Natural Source Electromagnetics

The superior depth of investigation of natural source electromagnetic techniques makes these methods excellent candidates for crustal studies as well as for mining and hydrocarbon exploration. The traditional natural source method, the magnetotelluric (MT) technique, has practical limitations because the surveys are costly and time consuming due to the labor intensive nature of ground based surveys. In an effort to continue to use the penetration advantage of natural sources, it has long been recognized that tipper data, the ratio of the local vertical magnetic field to the horizontal magnetic field, provide information about 3D electrical conductivity structure. It was this understanding that prompted the development of AFMAG (Audio Frequency Magnetics) and recently the new airborne Z-Axis Tipper Electromagnetic Technique (ZTEM). In ZTEM, the vertical component of the magnetic field is recorded above the entire survey area, while the horizontal fields are recorded at a ground-based reference station. MT processing techniques yield frequency domain transfer functions typically between 30-720 Hz that relate the vertical fields over the survey area to the horizontal fields at the reference station. The result is a cost effective procedure for collecting natural source EM data and for finding large scale targets at moderate depths. It is well known however that 1D layered structures produce zero vertical magnetic fields and thus ZTEM data cannot recover such background conductivities. This is in sharp contrast to the MT technique where electric fields are measured and a 1D background conductivity can be recovered from the off diagonal elements of the impedance tensor. While 1D models produce no vertical fields, two and three dimensional structures will produce anomalous currents and a ZTEM response. For such models the background conductivity structure does affect the data. In general however, the ZTEM data have weak sensitivity to the background conductivity and while we show that it is possible to obtain the background structure by inverting the ZTEM data alone, it is desirable to obtain robust background conductivity information from other sources. This information could come from a priori geologic and petrophysical information or from additional geophysical data such as MT. To counter the costly nature of large MT surveys and the limited sensitivity of the ZTEM technique to the background conductivity we show that an effective method is to collect and invert both MT and ZTEM data. A sparse MT survey grid can gather information about the background conductivity and deep structures while keeping the survey costs affordable. Higher spatial resolution at moderate depths can be obtained by flying multiple lines of ZTEM data.