Completeness - I. Revisited, reviewed and revived

We have extended and improved the statistical test recently developed by Rauzy for assessing the completeness in apparent magnitude of magnitude-redshift surveys. Our improved test statistic retains the robust properties - specifically independence of the spatial distribution of galaxies within a survey - of the T_c statistic introduced in Rauzy's seminal paper, but now accounts for the presence of both a faint and bright apparent magnitude limit. We demonstrate that a failure to include a bright magnitude limit can significantly affect the performance of Rauzy's T_c statistic. Moreover, we have also introduced a new test statistic, T_v, defined in terms of the cumulative distance distribution of galaxies within a redshift survey. These test statistics represent powerful tools for identifying and characterizing systematic errors in magnitude-redshift data.

We discuss the advantages of the T_c and T_v statistics over standard completeness tests, particularly the widely used test which assumes spatial homogeneity, and we demonstrate how our T_v statistic can essentially be regarded as an improved, cumulative test which makes better use of the magnitude completeness information in a redshift survey. Finally, we apply our completeness test to three major redshift surveys: The Millennium Galaxy Catalogue (MGC), The Two Degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS) and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We confirm that MGC and SDSS are complete up to the published (faint) apparent magnitude limit of and m_r = 17.45 mag, respectively, indicating there are no residual systematic effects within the photometry. Furthermore, we show that, unless a bright limit is included for 2dFGRS, the data set displays significant incompleteness at magnitudes brighter than the published limit of .