Submarine Pyroclastic Flow Deposits; July 2003 Dome Collapse Event of the Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat, West Indies

What happens when pyroclastic flows enter the ocean? To date, the subject of submarine pyroclastic flow behaviour has been controversial. Ambiguity arises from inconclusive evidence of a subaqueous depositional environment in ancient successions, to difficulty in sampling the in situ products of modern eruptions. A research voyage of the RRS James Clark Ross (9-18 May 2005) sampled 52 sites offshore from the volcanic island of Montserrat. The Soufrière Hills volcano, Montserrat, has been active since 1995 with eruptive behaviour dominated by andesite lava dome growth and collapse. Over 90% of the pyroclastic material produced has been deposited into the ocean. In July 2003 the Soufrière Hills volcano produced the largest historically documented dome collapse event. 210 x 106 m3 of pyroclastic material avalanched down the Tar River Valley, southeast Montserrat, to be deposited into the ocean. Bathymetric imaging and coring of offshore pyroclastic deposits, with a specific focus on the July 2003 units, reveals that the pyroclastic flows mix rapidly and violently with the water as they enter the ocean. Mixing takes place between the shore and 500 m depth where the deposition of basal coarse-grained parts of the flow initiates on slopes of 15° or less. The coarse components (pebbles to boulders) are deposited proximally from dense basal slurries to form steep sided, near linear ridges that amalgamate to form a kilometer-scale submarine fan. These proximal deposits contain <1% of ash-grade material. The finer components (dominantly ash-grade) are mixed into the overlying water column to form turbidity currents that flow distances >40 km from source. The total volume of pyroclastic material deposited within the submarine environment during this event exceeds 170 x 106 m3, with 65% deposited in proximal lobes and 35% deposited as distal turbidites. This broadly correlates with the block and ash components respectively, of the source subaerial pyroclastic flow. However, the efficient sorting and physical differentiation of the submarine flows, in comparison to the original mixture of their subaerial counterparts, suggests that the pyroclastic flows mix thoroughly with seawater and generate sediment gravity currents which are stratified in grain size and concentration.