Cu, Fe, and Zn Isotope Variations Within a High-Temperature Mid-Ocean Ridge Sulfide Structure

Hydrothermal processes at mid-ocean ridges play an important role in controlling the transition metal budget of seawater and the crust through which it circulates. Preliminary work has shown stable metal isotope variations accompany these processes. We report Cu, Zn, and Fe isotope analyses of transects through a high temperature sulfide structure ("Fin") collected during the 1998 Edifice Rex Sulfide Recovery Project. We analyzed two horizontal transects through the sulfide edifice, from inner conduit to outer surface. Transects A and F are 9 and 6 cm in length, respectively. Each displays radially zoned mineralogy progressing from a chalcopyrite (ccp) zone through zones of zinc sulfide, pyrite-anhydrite (pyr-anh) matrix, zinc sulfide-anhydrite (zns-anh) matrix, to an outer well-cemented silica (Si) zone. Additional ccp and pyr-anh zones appear in transect A resulting from a smaller breakout conduit. In transect A, Cu displays the most isotopic variation, with little variation in Fe and Zn isotopes. From the inner ccp zone outward, the Cu isotope profile shows a 0.4‰ (±0.05‰ 2σ) increase in the first pyr-anh zone over the coarse-grained ccp zone. The δ65Cu drops by 0.6‰ in the secondary ccp zone and recovers to values of the innermost wall in the following zone where it is constant until the outermost portion of the Si rich zone, which shows a 1.3‰ increase over inner zone values. The Zn isotope profile has a total variation of 0.27‰ (±0.05‰ 2σ), with a 0.2‰ increase in the first pyr- anh zone followed by a .27‰ decrease in the adjacent zone, and recovering to its heaviest values in the second pyr-anh zone. The Zn profile lacks any significant increase of the δ^{64}Zn in the outermost zones. The Fe isotope profile shows very little variation across the chimney wall, but does have a sharp 0.7‰ (±0.1‰ 2σ) increase in the δ56Fe in the well-cemented Si rich zone. In transect F, the Cu isotope profile again shows the most variation, but displays a more pronounced jump of 1.3‰ at the zinc sulfide boundary and no obvious increase of the δ65Cu in the Si rich zone. Similarly with Zn, there is a 0.35‰ increase of the δ^{64}Zn, but no outer wall increase. Fe, on the other hand, has variation of the same order as transect A, and shows a 0.6‰ increase of the δ56Fe in both the zns-anh and Si rich zones. These profiles are likely the result of a combination of diffusion and advection processes, fluid mineral equilibria, and mineral-mineral equilibria. High δ values of the outer zones likely reflect oxidation reactions with seawater. Processes responsible for isotopic variations within interior zones of the structure are ambiguous. Kinetic effects and biological activity may play a role, as Zn, which is not redox sensitive and only minimally coordination sensitive, has profiles that are qualitatively similar to Cu and Fe, but less analytically pronounced. Our findings are within the range of other published results, and further illustrate such measurable metal isotope variation exists not only on the vent field scale among chimneys, but systematically within chimney walls.