Report on an Informal Survey of Groundwater Modeling Practitioners About How They Quantify Uncertainty: Which Tools They Use, Why, and Why Not.

Hydrogeology is among the most data-limited of the earth sciences, so that uncertainty arises in every aspect of subsurface flow and transport modeling, from conceptual model to spatial discretization to parameter values. Thus treatment of uncertainty is unavoidable, and the literature and conference proceedings are replete with approaches, templates, paradigms and such for doing so. However, such tools remain not well used, especially those of the stochastic analytic sort, leading recently to explicit inquiries about why this is the case, in response to which entire journal issues have been dedicated. In an effort to continue this discussion in a constructive way we report on an informal yet extensive survey of hydrogeology practitioners, as the "marketplace" for techniques to deal with uncertainty. We include scientists, engineers, regulators, and others in the survey, that reports on quantitative (or not) methods for uncertainty characterization and analysis, frequency and level of usage, and reasons behind the selection or avoidance of available methods. Results shed light on fruitful directions for future research in uncertainty quantification in hydrogeology.