Are Unitarizable Groups Amenable?
Abstract
We give a new formulation of some of our recent results on the following problem: if all uniformly bounded representations on a discrete group $G$ are similar to unitary ones, is the group amenable? In §5, we give a new proof of Haagerup's theorem that, on non-commutative free groups, there are Herz-Schur multipliers that are not coefficients of uniformly bounded representations. We actually prove a refinement of this result involving a generalization of the class of Herz-Schur multipliers, namely the class $M_d(G)$ which is formed of all the functions $f\colon G\to {\bb C}$ such that there are bounded functions $\xi_i\colon G\to B(H_i, H_{i-1})$ ($H_i$ Hilbert) with $H_0 = {\bb C}$, $H_d ={\bb C}$ such that $$f(t_1t_2... t_d) = \xi_1(t_1) \xi_2(t_2)... \xi_d(t_d).\qquad \forall t_i\in G$$ We prove that if $G$ is a non-commutative free group, for any $d\ge 1$, we have $$M_d(G)\not= M_{d+1}(G),$$ and hence there are elements of $M_d(G)$ which are not coefficients of uniformly bounded representations. In the case $d=2$, Haagerup's theorem implies that $M_2(G)\not= M_{4}(G).$
- Publication:
-
arXiv Mathematics e-prints
- Pub Date:
- May 2004
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.math/0405282
- arXiv:
- arXiv:math/0405282
- Bibcode:
- 2004math......5282P
- Keywords:
-
- Operator Algebras;
- Representation Theory;
- 43A07;
- 43A22;
- 43A65;
- 47D03;
- 47L25;
- 47L55
- E-Print:
- Minor corrections and clarifications