Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality
Abstract
Using computer databases of scientific papers in physics, biomedical research, and computer science, we have constructed networks of collaboration between scientists in each of these disciplines. In these networks two scientists are considered connected if they have coauthored one or more papers together. Here we study a variety of nonlocal statistics for these networks, such as typical distances between scientists through the network, and measures of centrality such as closeness and betweenness. We further argue that simple networks such as these cannot capture variation in the strength of collaborative ties and propose a measure of collaboration strength based on the number of papers coauthored by pairs of scientists, and the number of other scientists with whom they coauthored those papers.
- Publication:
-
Physical Review E
- Pub Date:
- July 2001
- DOI:
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132
- arXiv:
- arXiv:cond-mat/0011144
- Bibcode:
- 2001PhRvE..64a6132N
- Keywords:
-
- 89.75.Hc;
- 89.65.-s;
- 89.70.+c;
- 01.30.-y;
- Networks and genealogical trees;
- Social and economic systems;
- Information theory and communication theory;
- Physics literature and publications;
- Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics;
- Physics - Physics and Society
- E-Print:
- 17 pages, 10 figures, 3 tables. Minor corrections and updates in this version. Accompanying material can be found on the web at http://www.santafe.edu/~mark/collaboration/