Paleomagnetic Constraints on Terrane Translation: the Churn Creek Succession in South Central British Columbia

A fundamental controversy in Cordilleran tectonics concerns the timing and magnitude of terrane displacement in the Cretaceous to Tertiary evolution of the North American continental margin. Paleomagnetic data from stratified and plutonic rocks in the Canadian Cordillera suggest large-scale northward translation of these rocks relative to the North American craton between ca. 90-55 Ma. Previous paleomagnetic interpretation predicted the existence of a major fault separating the Intermontane Superterrane, which was displaced ~1000 km northward during this period, from the Insular Superterrane, which was displaced ~3000 km northward during the same time interval. Geologic data, including structural, stratigraphic and sedimentologic studies, suggest less than a few hundred km motion between the superterranes, and less than 1000 km with respect to the craton. The conflicting data sets have generated intense debate between proponents of two fundamentally opposed tectonic models, one proposing major latitudinal displacement during Late Cretaceous to Eocene time, and one arguing for terrane accretion at or slightly south of the present latitude in mid-Cretaceous time. Stratigraphic and paleomagnetic data from Churn Creek, in south-central British Columbia document widely disparate terrane displacement values within a single stratigraphic section. Upper Cretaceous strata exposed in Churn Creek comprise two rock packages: a lower package of Albian volcanic and minor volcaniclastic rocks, and a disconformably overlying upper package of Albian to Santonian polymict conglomerate and associated clastic strata. Paleomagnetic data suggest the lower package formed 700 +/- 600 km to the south of its present position at ~100-105 Ma, tying it to other Intermontane Superterrane results. The disconformably overlying upper package was deposited 3000 +/- 450 km to the south at between ~92-83 Ma, confirming the important Mount Tatlow result for the Insular Superterrane. Thus we demonstrate that there can be no "Baja BC fault" separating the Insular and Intermontane superterranes within this region. The large magnitude multi-stage 'yo-yo' translation required by these geophysical data are complex and geologically unreasonable under our current understanding of Late Cretaceous terrane displacement and oceanic plate trajectories. This is an important conclusion, as the Churn Creek data set is a microcosm of the Baja BC controversy, independent of disagreements about the validity of terrane linkages or other geologic data. If one assumes that the 'yo-yo' tectonics required by the Churn Creek data set are implausible, then one is forced to investigate other potential explanations for the observed data. Solutions to the conundrum may potentially exist in: 1) effect of differential compaction shallowing between the upper and lower packages in Churn Creek 2) the inevitability of initial dip in stratigraphic successions 3) the reliability of the Late Cretaceous reference pole 4) concordance of problematic paleomagnetic data with the Late Cretaceous Long Normal SuperChron 5) a rapid polar wander (TPW) episode in the Late Cretaceous 6) the hot spot reference frame, used to reconstruct Mesozoic plate motions, is inaccurate, and our understanding ocean plate trajectories is incomplete.